Česká verze English version Amsterdam office
KempHoogstad - Tax advice & solution" />
  • KempHoogstad - Tax advice & solution
  • Úvod
  • KempHoogstad tax advisors
  • Services
  • Clients
  • Know How
  • Contacts
Newsletter
2025
  • KempHoogstad Tax News 2/2025
2024
  • KempHoogstad, special 10/2024
  • KempHoogstad Tax News 9/2024
  • KempHoogstad Tax News 5/2024
Archiv
Subscribe to newsletter

Follow us on Linkedin

Kemphoogstrad LinkedIn
  • Tax and legal news
  • Publications

The risk of the so-called švarc system even in the case of a work contract between legal persons

05.09.2022

The Supreme Administrative Court (the SAC) has issued a judgment concerning the švarc system and a disguised (de facto) employment service (i.e. job agency/headhunting service). According to the court, what is crucial for the assessment of the actual situation is how the employee himself understands his position - even if the services are invoiced on the basis of a work contract between companies.

In the examined case, the execution of work at the client's workplace was carried out by several workers (women) of foreign nationality with whom the client had no contract. The foreign women worked at the same workplace with the client's employees; the work, training, supervision, tasks and remuneration from the client were the same as that which applied to the client's employees. They performed the same or similar work and were trained, supervised, tasked and paid by the client's employees. The majority of the foreign women concerned were not contracted by the contractor; on the contrary - all the foreign women considered the client to be their employer. Thus, the internal position of the foreign women at the workplace did not differ in any way from that of the client's employees. The SAC thus concluded that the foreign women's work fulfilled all the characteristics of a dependent activity in relation to the client, and thus that it constituted an instance of the švarc system, despite the fact that a work contract had been concluded between the companies, and invoicing took place. A fine of CZK 1 million was imposed. If it had been proved that the client had disguised the fact that it was a de facto employment agency, the financial penalty would have been even greater.

Inspections of illegal employment are still frequent and the penalties are very severe for both parties. Last year, 677 fines were imposed in the field of illegal employment, totalling to CZK 165 million. In respect of disguised employment, 134 fines were issued amounting to a total of almost CZK 67 million. We therefore recommend that you carefully examine your current and future contractual relationships with your suppliers.

Back to archive
Komora daňových poradců
IFA
LEGAL 500 Amea
CFO Club
CMA
Services
  • Transactional Advisory
  • Tax Advisory
  • Tax Compliance
  • Accounting Advisory
  • Accounting Methodology
  • Other Services
What sets us apart
  • Flexibility
  • Expertise
  • Independence
  • Confidentiality
  • Tradition
  • Quality guaranteed
Where you can find us Details Pobočka Praha

Hybernská 24
110 00 Prague 1

Czech Republic
+420 221 719 000
prague@kemphoogstad.com

Where you can find us Details Pobočka Amsterdam

De Boelelaan 7
1083 HJ Amsterdam
 
The Netherlands
+31 20 760 4500
info@vanloman.com

Copyright 2012 KempHoogstad, All rights reserved, created by GABBO
This website uses the audience measurement cookies. By using this site you consent to this. More info I Agree